THE medical conspiracy SHOW

(Written May 01, 2011:)

We've added this page as MORE conclusive proof, for any "doubters" who still don't believe that Lase Med Inc. has been the target of any sort of corporate sabotage, organized defamation, or conspiring officials within our honor-entrusted Court System.

As our narrator said in the closing comments of Episode #5 of our radio drama:
"Which is more powerful? The truth, or a big fat roll of duct tape?"
If recent events are any indication, it would sadly appear to be the latter.

January 2011 was the beginning of the deposition phase for the frivolous Westphal v Lase Med Inc et al lawsuit. Many months beforehand, Lase Med had presented to the Court the names and contact information for twelve (12) potential witnesses, whose cancer(s) had been successfully treated and killed with LIESH Therapy. The events which transpired over those months, after the presentation of witness information to the Plainiff’s Attorney, and leading up to the January depositions, were nothing short of a plot suitable for an espionage or mafia movie. What happened later in the Spring of 2011 concerning the sworn testimony of the four witnesses deposed, was equally as shocking and unbelievable, but no less true.

The first red flag was raised when more than one of these potential witnesses, who had only arrived at their present state of good health by AVOIDING standard cancer care, and by following Lase Med's PTG (Post-Treatment Guidelines), were inexplicably "saved" by mainstream oncologists ("saved" meaning hurt and/or terminated in this case), with lethal chemo drugs and/or morphine to make them "comfortable." We can only assume that the conventional ignorance which fuels the oncology industry was used in each case, to supplant the truth with their lucrative and commonly used myth that "only chemo can save you."

This is of course the same myth that had already been used by the medical establishment to destroy the results of LIESH Therapy, and kill off the patients whose records were demanded by the AR Medical Board, months prior to the filing of the lawsuit; the same myth whose deadly aftermath facilitated the 2010 onslaught of the "anti Lase Med" blog trolls, led by loved ones of these misled, unfortunate, and now deceased victims of the oncology industry’s interference (manufacturing their own "poster children" for their own malevolent agenda, which is abhorrent in itself); as well as a few successful ex patients whose minds were later manipulated by these bloggers, patients who believed what they read and then went back to conventional therapy. Some of them are deceased now as well.

The second red flag was raised when another one of Lase Med's potential witnesses on this list was involved in a mysterious hit-and-run "mafia style" traffic accident. The victim's car literally tumbled end-over-end and landed in a ditch. The driver of the assailant vehicle was amazingly never found nor identified. The victim (witness) suffered injuries that required hospitalization, where he found himself under the "care" of oncologists, though hospitalized for injuries having nothing to do with cancer. The victim was also charged with moving traffic violations for "losing control of his vehicle" during the hit and run accident which he did not cause. Does that sound at all suspicious?

The third red flag was raised, when remaining witness on the list, candidates who had NOT been subsequently killed nor seriously injured, were ignored for a long time and eventually opposed on grounds that they were from "out of State" (ie: not from Arkansas). Keep in mind, this was a case filed in Arkansas, by an ex politician /attorney (whose legislative record shows a clear money trail to the local cancer hospital, UAMS, that had tried for almost 20 years to steal Lase Med's data and the specifics of their treatment); a lawsuit filed on behalf of a plaintiff from California (another state), most of whose witnesses were also from outside of Arkansas, against a company which was in yet another state (and, we should add, was completely out of this Court's jurisdiction).

After two previous defense attorneys (Carlos Negrete of San Juan Capistrano, CA; and Todd Griffin, of Little Rock, AR ) had been fired by Dr. Carpenter for gross negligence (taking obscene sums of money in exchange for doing nothing), and Lase Med Inc was on their third attorney (James Hicks, of Tulsa, OK),
FOUR (4) successful ex LIESH patients were finally, against all odds, sworn in and deposed as witnesses, in January 2011. These four witnesses were questioned by both the plaintiff's attorney (Will Bond) and Lase Med Inc's attorney (James Hicks). One of these patient-witnesses was herself a medical doctor, a retired surgeon. The witnesses all complained afterward to Dr. Carpenter, that they were not allowed to speak freely and were continually "cut off" mid sentence. One even commented to Carpenter that she should "not trust her attorney;" even the witness sensed during deposition that he was working against her. These depositions were recorded on video tape; and their testimonies were recorded by a court stenographer in the presence of both attorneys.

More red flags had of course come up along the way, over the months leading up to January; to include a change of judge, and numerous delays of the trial date, requested by the Plaintiff’s attorney, contrary to official claims.

The next red flag was more recent; it was raised in April of 2011. This red flag was a HUGE, PIVOTAL, and ABSOLUTELY INEXCUSABLE BOLD-FACED LIE, written into Page Six of a signed and sealed Court Order, filed on April 11th, 2011, by Judge James M. Moody. This court order was found at this url: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/arkansas/aredce/4:2009cv00099/77558/

The Court Order, Filing #131, contained the following words:

"Although defendants (Lase Med) stated in their brief that they would supply deposition testimony from former Lase Med patients who had successful LIESH Therapy, NO DEPOSITIONS HAVE BEEN FILED, AND NO EVIDENCE EXISTS in the record to prove that LIESH has been beneficial to any patient.
(Brief in Support of Summary Judg. at p. 11, fn 1)."

This is more than just a lie. It is an absolute outrage, a clear breach of due process, and it constitutes suppression of evidence. One must make note of the fact that this official court order does NOT say "several witnesses were provided, but all were disqualified;" nor does it say "witness testimony provided was not found to have any significance or validity." It blatantly says "No depositions were filed, and no testimony EXISTS."

The next red flag was minor, but it was connected to the previous red flag; it involved a hacker exploit that compromised the machine on which the Lase Med Inc and Medical Conspiracy websites were stored locally. This was not the first time Lase Med had been attacked by a hacker though. In the summer of 2010, several fake “search hits” had been placed on search engines, containing the name “Antonella Carpenter.” These were not web pages at all, they were “trojan horse” malware loaders disguised as web addresses; the unsuspecting web surfer would click these links thinking he was going to an article about Dr. Carpenter, and end up with an infected machine. These links are NOT filtered out by "safe search" enabled search engines. They are still near the top of search results. Intentional sabotage.

This latest hacker attack, a "router exploit" that occurred on the 21st or 22nd of April 2011, was also used to hack the webmaster's VoIP phone line. The hacker's work was discovered on the Friday before the April 23rd airing of The Medical Conspiracy show. During the show on the 23rd, about 15 minutes into the third hour, the webmaster, who uses the pseudonym "Arnie," was intentionally “scrambled” while he was on the air, at the exact moment that he attempted to discuss this newly found Court Order, Filing #131 (above), based on the LIE that Lase Med had produced no evidence nor testimony.

These "untouchables" have killed witnesses, they have driven at least one into a ditch (probably as an attempted murder or "hit"), they have requested that other witnesses be disqualified for nothing more than being residents of "another state," and are now DENYING THE VERY EXISTENCE OF SWORN TESTIMONY!

No official decision was provided on record on the "out of state" disqualification subject. Do the statements: “NO DEPOSITIONS WERE FILED" and "NO EVIDENCE EXISTS” mean that the “out of state” argument was actually approved by the Judge and intentionally omitted from record?

Invoices of the "Non-Existent" Depositions,
from Accurate Court Reporting Inc.

This kind of despicable act, by not only a judge, but a FEDERAL judge, asupposed PILLAR of justice and integrity, is an absolute disgrace, a blatant BREACH OF DUE PROCESS, an irrefutable instance of SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE, not to mention, an affront to everything implied and suggested by the title "Your Honor."